Tuesday, May 10, 2011

The beauty of capitalism

Never Done: I went to Ikea

And everything's so pretty! From a new experiences point of view, this one was such a very long time coming. I had no idea it was so big that there would be arrows on the floor to keep us all going in some semblance of order through the store. And in fact, this week's mide (middah) is Order: All actions and possessions shall have a set place and time. But does my trip to Ikea have anything at all to do with the ethical considerations of order? Yes, because if I were a person who buys and buys and buys, then my actions would be out of order. And in fact, I am a person who has a hard time buying some basics -- like clothes -- and so I end up wearing the same two t-shirts for literally years until they wear out. They are currently wearing out -- the black one has holes in the front, and the white one has yellow underarm stains. I haven't found the time to replace them. I spoke with a friend on the phone the other day who just came home from Jazz Fest, and reported that she danced and sweat so much that the tie-dyed clothes she was wearing bled onto several of her white T-shirts. My private reaction to this was, "You have more than one white T-shirt?"

My friends who shop all offer to go with me, and I think I might need that, but I also don't want to take them up on their offers because I think it means we'll have to stay in stores long enough to find clothes that fit me, and I just don't enjoy being in stores that much. Trying clothes on annoys me. On with the pants. Off with the pants. Which shirt do you need to look at this pair of pants? Which shirt do you need to look at that pair of pants? And in the end, I end up with one pair of jeans and a and two t-shirts at a time, and then an assortment of skirts with the same two shirts to go with them, and then an assortment of pretty shirts that go with nothing else I own.

I'm not saying it's unethical to not own enough clothes, but it is unbalanced. But you know what isn't unbalanced? My ability to appreciate beauty, and to figure out a way to enjoy being inside a a warehouse full of capitalism. Who knew that Ikea is one of the best museums in the city? Donation only! And you can take photos! Check it:










































Monday, May 9, 2011

I did a brick (it's a triathlon thing)

Never Done: I did a brick

A brick is when you try practicing two sports, one right after the other. I missed Saturday morning biking practice because my neck hurt like crazy and I was just plumb tired, so I slept in -- all the way til 8:30 (woohoo!) Then I decided that was a good opportunity to try biking and then running on Sunday. I wasn't sure how it was going to go, but I knew that it would hinge on Decisiveness: One you make a decision, act without hesitation. It was the first time I was going to do a real bike training session on a real bike. [Thousands of blessings to Mich for lending me hers til the one I am borrowing from Kara (thousands of blessings to Kara for shipping her bike across the country.)] I made a promise to myself that I would ride at least two times around the park, and at most three. I didn't want to quit after one time up the hard hill, but I also didn't want to overdo it on my first time. Later I found out that the team did SIX loops around the park on Saturday, but I guess I have time to build up to that.

What is important to say? The first time up the big hill was hard. My breath was labored. I felt crummy. But I got through it, and kept going, and recovered quite quickly, and by the time I came to the start point and had to decide if I was going around a second time, it was easy to stick to my decision that I would do at least 2 loops. The second time around, I played with the gears more, and got to know how they worked more efficiently than the first time around. And when I came to the big hill, it was still hard, but my lungs worked a little less hard, and I got to the top feeling better than I did the first time. When I swung around the loop a third time (these are 5K loops, by the way, and they each took me 15 minutes) I was tempted to knock it off and switch to running, but I remembered the mide (middah) of Decisiveness, realized I was fine for another loop, and immediately went for it.

There was a point when I was actually pedaling along quickly and passing people and feeling smug about it, when out of the blue, a guy zipped past me -- on the same bike I usually ride -- the little Swift Folder with small wheels that I have been so slow on. Zipped past me, I tell you. Now, he might have had more gears on there than I do, but basically, he was nonetheless making a mockery of my weeks of complaints about riding the little bike. I became a little obsessed with him, and tried to catch him, but he was either so fast that he disappeared out of sight, or he got out of the park at Ocean Parkway. (I choose to believe the latter.) So OK, Decisiveness with a little Humility thrown in. I can deal with that.

Third time up the hill was easier still, and I was tempted to go for another loop, but again remembered my earlier decision not to push it, so as I came around to my starting point, I dashed home to stash the bike and start the run.

Oh, the wobbly legs! From the start, I felt like stopping. But I had told myself that if I could run one loop (5K) around the park, I would know that I am ready to do the Pancake Sprint triathlon on June 5. (It's called the Pancake because it's flat as a pancake, and they serve you pancakes afterwards.) But after about 10 minutes, my right calf and foot just cramped right up and hurt too much to run. It had nothing to do with riding first -- it's what I've been trying to get help with for weeks. I stopped to stretch, and then kept going, and within a minute it hurt too much to run again. I tried to run through it, but then I realized that decisiveness cuts both ways, and if I knew in my soul that I had to stop, I should just stop.

I stopped. I felt defeated. I tried not to feel defeated. I started to walk. I decided to look to see if the elderflowers are blooming so I can make elderflower pressé again (made it for the first time last year and it was amazing) when I ran into my Team in Training mentor, who told me, among other things, that the first time you do a bike-run brick, you are just supposed to run for 10 minutes. So look at that -- I inadvertently did my first brick exactly right. And the elderflowers are blooming.

Sunday, May 8, 2011

I had my first unsupervised visit with R

Never Done: I had my first unsupervised visit with R

And I wrote all about it when I got home, careful to describe the evening without writing anything that would be too revealing about R, since I don't have her permission to write about this, and also because we are so very early in the bureaucratic process that I don't want to risk being public about it -- and then when I woke up in the morning I realized I shouldn't push PUBLISH POST on any of what I wrote. That as careful as I was, it was still too much. So this morning I looked over the post and blacked out words, and am about to deliver to you my first Wiki-Leaks-like document.

Some time in the week, Josh and I found that we probably could spend some time alone with R on Saturday evening. We weren't sure how much time -- an hour? Five hours? or even if it would really happen at all. So we started to brainstorm things we could do, given that we'd be off our usual beaten path, since we'd pick her up in XXXX and drop her off in XXXX. I started by looking for a good Cinco de Mayo cultural event, and while I found two events with the help of the wonderful Mexican cultural organization Mano a Mano, neither of them worked out for time or location reasons.

Then we started looking for places we could play ping pong in Manhattan. I have been excited to go to the ping pong club (Spin) that Susan Sarandon co-owns with her alleged new boyfriend, but I misread the website and thought it was all members only, and expensive at that. (It turns out that while it is a membership-based club, there are also walk-in rates for non-members, to the tune of $20/half hour, and you can't make a reservation.) But since we didn't know how long this date was going to be, we didn't know what kind of plans we could make, which the more I think about it was a good way to prepare for living with a teenager. In the end, we found out that we would have three hours total, including travel from XXXX to XXXX on a Saturday night, and so we opted to just have dinner together.

We offered her to go out somewhere in Manhattan or to go to a good Mexican restaurant I know in XXXX. Her eyes lit up, and she said, "That." I mentioned that it was Cinco de Mayo weekend, and she said that she hadn't gotten to celebrate her holiday -- and with that, we were decided. So we left, and drove north, talking all the way. She asked me what kind of Mexican food I like the best, and I answered honestly that I love taquitos de carne asada (grilled steak tacos), and enchiladas when they're made with corn tortillas, and sopas, and that sometimes I love posole. "Posole? You know posole? Wow, hearing you say that like you XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX that you know something about Mexican food that's beyond quesadillas XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. That's crazy. How did you XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX?

It was a stunning moment. To see that my tiny bit of cultural knowledge was so meaningful to her was humbling. I don't usually think that my knowing some Spanish and having some knowledge of Mexican culture is one of the most essential parts of me, but it might turn out to be one of the most essential elements of our early relationship.

Our dinner together was wonderful. We went back and forth between gabbing about any old thing, and asking each other questions. R is still trying to figure out how it is possible that I don't like to XXXX. She's trying all sorts of angles. What do I think about XXXX? (A little overwhelming.) Do I like sunglasses? (I don't love them the way I love, say, music, but since I need them, I want them to look great.) What size am I? (Varies.) And I'm trying all angles back. What kind of outdoor activities does she like? (XXXX, XXXX, and XXXX -- none of them being outdoor activities.) But we also had good, deep conversations about girls and boys and power in relationships, and if it possible to learn a lesson when the lesson is being delivered with XXXX, and what did R think might be the hardest part about moving in to someone's home? She is a pleasure -- a talker, funny, open, warm, smart, independent.

Not that I think that because I enjoy her company this will be an easy path together, but here's the thing: she makes it easy to see what a good person she is, and how hard she is trying to make a good life for herself, and how hard she is trying to make sense of how incredibly weird her life has become (looking at it from her perspective as much as I can.) And that is probably exactly what I need to keep doing -- look from her perspective as much as I can, with all its blacked-out bits.

Saturday, May 7, 2011

I had an all-Kushner day

Never Done: I spent the morning co-writing a petition to get CUNY to reverse its decision to deny Tony Kushner an honorary doctorate, and then I saw Tony, and then I saw Tony's new play, The Intelligent Homosexual's Guide to Capitalism and Socialism with a Key to the Scriptures

So CUNY decided to give Tony Kushner an honorary doctorate, but then Jeffrey Weisenfeld, one of the CUNY trustees with a history of extreme anti-Arab racism, attacked Kushner with unfounded "information" about Kushner's supposed views on Israel and convinced the board to reverse its decision, and then lots of people rallied to Kushner's defense -- and to the defense of free and open debate -- including Jews for Racial and Economic Justice (JFREJ), Jewish Voice for Peace, Jews Say No!, Jews against Islamophobia, The Shalom Center, and many others (I co-wrote the petition as a representative of the board of JFREJ) and then one of the trustees contacted Kushner, not exactly to apologize, but to open a discussion about reversing the decision.

And just after we all signed off on the petition, I had to go deliver some hard drives to my friend and colleague Brett in Crown Heights, and since it was really really nice out, I decided to stop off to stick my nose in the apple and lilac blossoms at the Botanic Garden for an hour, which I wait for all winter, and then I wait for all early Spring, and then it comes so suddenly, and it stays such a short time -- but it feels longer if you live in the country, because you don't have to go somewhere to find them, you just get to be with them every time you go outside. And just as I was taking in the heady fragrance of some particularly beautiful lilacs, I got a call from someone I had been working with in the morning that now I had to read over and sign off on a press release on the same topic, and so the world of fighting against anti-Arab racists who are willing to shame and blame fellow Jews for more progressive political beliefs collided with the world of Angel White and Beauty of Moscow and Congo and Maiden's Blush and President Grevy and President Lincoln and Primrose and Sensation and Tinkerbelle, which are all, as you already probably guessed, lilac varieties.

It so happened that my tickets (which I bought months ago) to see iHo, as Kushner calls his play, were for that same night -- a coincidence that I would have an all-Kushner day, to mirror the Signature Theatre's all-Kushner season. And it just so happened that Tony was in the lobby when I was, dropping off copies of the Communist Manifesto for his cast, and then not staying to watch -- which he was probably happy about, since his play opened the night before. So we had a quick hello, and then I went into the theater, with greater anticipation than I've had in years for a new play.

I don't want to review it here, and I don't want to give anything away, but really, if you can, you should go. It's like an Arthur Miller dialectic sitcom -- a really long sitcom, or maybe you're sick in bed and watch 8 half-hour episodes in a row. It's completely rooted in at least three worlds that I'm completely rooted in (gay/lez, labor, and Brooklyn) and it's all about people trying to balance out their commitment to their principles with their commitment to their community (family, friends, lovers.) It's messy, it's funny, it's brilliant. It's as heady as the lilacs, but much louder. It's a masterful exploration of personal vs political ethics, and if you do go see it, please talk with me afterwards.

Friday, May 6, 2011

A stranger read me a bedtime story

Never Done: A stranger (artist) read me a bedtime story

Let me start with the words of the artist:

In Here Is Where We Meet, artist Madhu Kaza will travel to individual participant’s homes by appointment to read to them at bedtime. This project is part of the artist’s ongoing Hospitality series, which includes projects that explore social conventions, rituals of domestic and daily life, relations between strangers, hosts and guests, and boundaries of public and intimate space. Here is Where We Meet is particularly concerned with the transitional state between wakefulness and sleep (including the drift from the world of stories to the world of dreams), a re-engagement of voice in our experience of texts, and the possibility of trust.

And now, my words. A couple weeks ago, on the day I flew home from Germany, Abigail wrote to me to tell me that her friend Madhu is doing this project where she goes to people's houses and reads to them at bedtime, and that she thought I should do it for my Never Done year. When I went to Madhu's project website, I knew right away that I wanted to do this. I loved the idea of sharing the liminal space between being awake and being asleep with someone I don't know, but whom I could assume I could trust. It's a little hard, now that I have met Madhu and have a real experience of her, to summon up the images I had of what she might be like, but I think that knowing she was Abigail's friend and a doctoral candidate in comparative literature, and the fact that she describes the project in terms of trust were enough to allow me to trust her in my space.

I filled in her application questionnaire:

Please list the members of your household and their relation to you (including pets): Josh, partner

What time do you go to sleep? 11 PM

What days and/or dates you are available for an appointment? (I gave her lots of dates.)

Please describe your bedtime rituals: I try to have my teeth brushed by 11, close the shades, and get in bed with very little light, and read until I fall asleep. The rest is erratic -- sometimes I shower, sometimes I don't. I usually wear the same t-shirt for pajamas but sometimes I wear real pajamas or nightgown. If it's warm out I open the window. If it's cold out I keep it closed but turn off the heat so I don't get hot in the night. If I am sleeping with Josh, I take a blanket off the bed. If I am sleeping without him, I add a blanket. No computer in bed before sleep.

Please list a few books that you love: Fugitive Pieces, To the Wedding, Pride and Prejudice, Just Kids. (and so many more)

How did you hear about this project? From Abigail Miller

What most interests you about participating in this project? My liminal space between wake and sleep is very, very tiny. I tend to be very alert and then on the verge of sleep, and then asleep -- without much transition time. When I am alone, I love to cross that line with a book. I think it would be very interesting to see what it would be like with a benign stranger/artist -- and the words of some wonderful writer. Will I want to stay awake to experience it more? Will I trust that falling asleep IS experiencing it more?

She wrote me back and we scheduled, and I started thinking about what book I might like her to read to me. I have not read the book she has named her project after, Here Is Where We Meet by John Berger, but I have read others of his books, including To the Wedding, which is a gorgeous love story about AIDS, rooted in his own family's experience. Most of my books are in storage. Really, most. Hundreds are in storage, and only a couple dozen are here. And when I looked on the shelf, I realized that I don't love most of the books that I have here with me. I'm not using love sarcastically here -- I am not saying that the books suck -- I am saying that there's a difference between a book that is useful, or well-written, or interesting, or substantial, or a guilty pleasure and a book that I love.

I meant to get a book I love from the library before Madhu came over, but I didn't. Instead, I stewed about what it means that I have been living for so long now without my books, and while I was at it, I stewed about living without all my other stuff (my warm winter boots, most of my pretty shoes, my guitar, my CD collection, my LP collection, etc.) But mostly my books. I really miss them. Living in limbo has required a great deal of Patience: Do not aggravate a situation with wasted grief -- but is it wasted grief that I miss my books, that I wanted to find No Flying in the House the other day after I went walking with L, that I want to lend one of my extra copies of Goodbye Without Leaving to ... damn, to whom? You see the problem? I have already forgotten who would love to read that book. I think it is wasted grief that I stewed over this instead of going to the library to get a copy of something, but here's the thing. I ended up finding a wonderful book for her to read to me.

I have been trying to read Soul Mountain for years now. Josh adored it, and highly recommended it. I started it, put it down, started it, put it down, and started it and put it down. My recollection is that I thought it was beautiful, but that I didn't have a sense of the narrative, and so I just didn't stay engaged. It's a book full of close observation, and I think I grew impatient with the lack of story. "But it won the Nobel Prize for literature," I would tell myself, trying to convince myself to keep reading. But I never kept reading.

At one point, I asked Josh to tell me what happens at the end. I think, actually, that he told me that the last page was wonderful, and so I was going to read the last page -- which is something I tend to do -- but he just hated the idea that I would jump to the end without arriving there step by step. This precipitated a huge discussion about the valid ways to engage with literature, and during that discussion, I came to understand that my tendency to jump to the end has a lot to do with wanting to avoid unnecessary tension, as a result of extremely tense trauma I've experienced, and that if it means that by skipping to the end I will pay closer attention to the journey of the rest of the book, that that's completely valid.

The language in Soul Mountain is gorgeous, and I thought it might be interesting to hear it in Madhu's voice, as a new way in. And even if it turned out not to be a new way in, it would at least be a new experience of the beginning. So let me tell you what it was like to have Madhu come over and read to me.

She showed up and I immediately felt like I already knew her. She came in and chatted easily, and she asked me if I was sleepy (I was) and Josh gave her a gorgeous scone he had made (with no flour but almond flour) and I brought her in to the bedroom, where I had set up a chair and a glass of water and a lamp and my book. We talked for a while before she started to read. I don't actually remember what she asked me, but I do remember we talked about Soul Mountain, and I told her the final image of the book (Josh finally agreed to tell me): an image of god as a frog, with one eye continuously open, and one eye continuously blinking. She showed me the little book she was making for each person she's reading to -- it looked like a little Muji notebook, and she asked me to sign the front of it. She told me she was going to write the first and last lines she read into the booklet, and also some other notes. She reminded me that she was going to tape record her reading. And then some other warm talking -- I don't remember about what -- but I do remember that it felt like talking with a friend.

And then she transitioned into reading. "Soul Mountain. One. The old bus is a city reject. After shaking in it for twelve hours on the potholed highway since early morning, you arrive in this mountain country town in the South." And she kept reading, and I watched and listened to her read, and voice was fluid and melodic and soothing, and she was a wonderful reader -- I don't often follow well when someone else is reading, but I followed. I heard Gao Xinhjian's images, and I heard his humor, and I loved it when both Madhu and I found the same passages funny, and at some point I remembered the truth about why I haven't continued reading this book. He uses a second person convention -- it is right there in the first paragraph that I printed above -- that I find confusing and annoying. Normally when someone uses the second person, it's clear what the convention is. It's either meant to be the reader, or it's meant actually to be the writer, or he's writing to another character in the novel. But in Soul Mountain, I have never understood what convention he is using -- it seems to move around -- and I find it incredibly annoying. Maybe it's incredibly literary. Maybe it's going to have a beautiful payoff, paid off by my stunning persistence and patience once I have actually read this book. But for now, it's annoying.

A little less annoying when Madhu was reading. Maybe because, unlike me, she didn't skip over "boring parts." In fact, with Madhu reading, I got to realize that reading this book is going to be like climbing an actual mountain. Sometimes there are going to be breathtaking vistas, and every now and then there's going to be a mountain spring to drink from, and sometimes you (second person meaning "one" and including me) are going to cross paths with other hikers, but mostly you just have to take step after step after step. Like training for the triathlon. Like Haruki Murakami writes about in What I Talk About When I Talk About Running. Like climbing a mountain.

And it's going to take patience -- and a commitment not to waste grief on the confusing second person convention -- nor on the question of whether I'm stupidly not getting his actually quite brilliant convention that's completely clear to everyone else. That most of all.

But I wasn't thinking about all this while Madhu was reading -- I was listening to Madhu read, and eventually I got sleepy, and I noticed the sensations in my body, that my legs were a little restless, that my neck hurt, that my heart rate was slowing down, that I was starting to drift. And then I did drift, and wake, and drift, and wake -- and I thought I was following, but I knew I wasn't really, and I would wake to images that I wasn't sure came from the book or my mind, and then I eventually turned on my side, and I just let myself be comforted by the melodic lull of Madhu's voice, and I knew I wasn't really hearing the words any more, and that was just fine with me, and then I was asleep, which I only knew because at some point I noticed that she turned off the light and slipped out of my room.

And I tucked myself deeper under the covers, and fell back to sleep until early morning. And Madhu, no longer a stranger, went out into the night, and rode the trains back to Manhattan. I hope we see each other again.

Thursday, May 5, 2011

I swam a mile in 35 minutes

Never Done: I swam a mile in 35 minutes

Last week I asked a lifeguard at the Prospect Park YMCA if she could monitor me swim a mile in under 45 minutes so I could qualify for the Great Hudson River Swim on May 28th. Not only did she agree, but she arranged for me to have a lane to myself, and I recruited her to do the triathlon with my Team in Training team. I want to do the Great Hudson River Swim for two reasons. One: I want some low-stakes experience swimming in the Hudson before the triathlon, and two: I might love it.

I've been swimming a lot more than usual lately, so I was pretty sure I would be able to do the mile in under 45 minutes, but I thought it might be just under. I usually swim a lap in about 50 seconds, so I thought it might take me 40 minutes, unless I slowed down after a while, which I expected I would do. But I practiced the two-beat kick that I just learned, and in the end I clocked in at about 47 seconds per lap -- and stayed steady the whole time.

Now NOT that I'm comparing myself to an Olympic swimmer, but Kate Ziegler can do this in 15:42.54. I've met Kate more than once, because she's been around when Josh and I have been filming for Parting the Waters, and she is about a foot taller than me (OK, 9 inches) with about 10 times the muscle mass I have. She -- and all the Olympic women swimmers -- are phenomenal to behold. Which reminds me of a little story.When Josh and I were at our first Golden Goggles awards, we were seated at a table with a bunch of employees of USA Swimming, and one of them (a woman) looked over at the towering, muscular women in their evening gowns, and remarked, "Some of them go too far." What did she mean? I tried to figure it out, but I couldn't, so I asked. "Well, some of them are just too ... muscular. I mean, do they have to look like men?" "But they're Olympic athletes!" I stammered, but she just cast a disapproving eye. I knew which one she meant. Rachel Komisarz, whose upper arms have incredible muscle definition, and who looked AMAZING in her strapless gown.

If Rachel -- an Olympic swimmer -- is going to get hit with homophobia for being too muscular, then just think about what kind of shit younger girls must still get for being strong and athletic. There were a bunch of girls in the pool when I was swimming my mile, and every now and then they would sneak a leg into my lane, so I knew they were paying attention to what I was doing. When I got done, a different lifeguard asked me what I was qualifying for, and I made sure to tell her a little extra loud, so the girls could hear. You never know -- maybe it will inspire them.
Like Rachel inspires me. Here, look:


Wednesday, May 4, 2011

In which the black and Latino people are nice to me and I can't find the Jews or the gays

Never Done: I ran hills

I mean, I have run up a hill before, and I have run down a hill before, but I have never run up a hill, and then run back down it only to intentionally run up it again, over and over again for 40 minutes. OK, 30, once you count the time running to and from the starting place. But rather than write about the running which was somewhat physically challenging, I would like to write about something that has been somewhat emotionally and socially challenging for me in this triathlon training: it is truly not a radical (or even progressive, or even thoughtful) space.

I've been joking casually about how I am the shortest, grayest, and most Jewish person on our team. And while it's funny to say this, the ways in which it's actually true are painful. Basically, most of the people on my team aren't very warm to me, including my coach. Is it because they're shy? Awkward? More comfortable with people more like them? (White, gentile, straight men and women?) Maybe. And so I do what I always try to do -- treat them as if they want to be warm to me. I smile at them, I say hi, I joke around. And believe it or not -- 9 times out of 10, they stare blankly back at me, as if I wasn't even there. Is it because they're shy? Awkward? Worried about the two beat kick we are learning in the pool? Maybe. And so I do what I always try to do -- treat them as if they want to be warm to me. Until I don't anymore, and I just think to myself, "Fuck it. I'm not here to make friends. I'm here to learn how to race a triathlon." Score one for the evil side.

But ... I am only telling part of the story. There are some people on my team who are consistently nice to me. Wary as I am of racial profiling, we've now been training together for 6 weeks, and so I feel like my scientific sample is growing more and more reliable. I'll give you one guess. OK, two guesses. You got it already? Right. Black people. The black people are consistently warm and friendly to me. And guess who else? The Latinos.

What's up with that? Am I actually warmer to my black and Latino teammates than I am to my white ones and everyone senses it and responds in kind? Are my black and Latino teammates feeling as marginalized as I am and so are more predisposed to respond to my warmth with warmth in return? Does it have nothing to do with me, and my black and Latino teammates are generally warmer and more team-oriented? Or more intentionally welcoming? Or some other explanation?

And by the way, where are the Jews? This is Brooklyn! Josh didn't believe me that I can't find the Jews on the team, and so I read him the names of the people I'm training with. Sander. Bullock. Stewart. Beam. Morefield. Stover. Maxwell. Hale. It was around this point that he raised a white flag in surrender. And I wasn't even intentionally omitting all the -berg and -stein names. They're really not there!

And while we're at it, where are the queers? They must be there, but I cannot find them. There was one woman in the pool who was nice to me one time, and she had hairy legs (I am not making this up) but I haven't seen her back again. The thing is, I actually know where the queers are. They are training with the Tritons, like I probably should have.

So what does any of this have to do with my Mussar practice? Well, it is a whole lot of otherness, isn't it? And a lot of it is coming from me. If the practice is to consider what is the burden of the other, I think I am actually doing well. If the practice is to become at home anywhere, even when I feel marginalized, I still have some work to do. I do have a sense that I belong, and I do have my own private understanding that I am doing really well, considering that I am totally keeping up with the majority of 20 somethings who are training. I might not be as fast as they are, but I am doing everything they are doing -- just slower. (Except in the pool, when I am doing it faster.)

Strangely, I think what I really need to do is stop worrying about the other people. Stop comparing myself. Stop worrying if they are judging me, and just reach for enjoyment of my own body moving through space. If I can do that -- if I can enjoy myself while I am training -- then I probably won't care how people see me, or don't.